![]() |
|
Chrysler lay-offs - Printable Version +- StogieChat Cigar Forum (https://www.stogiechat.com/forum) +-- Forum: News & Announcements (https://www.stogiechat.com/forum/forum-3.html) +--- Forum: StogieChat.com News (https://www.stogiechat.com/forum/forum-13.html) +--- Thread: Chrysler lay-offs (/thread-14290.html) |
- ColbyPants - 02-16-2007 Beerlord Wrote:when i hav eto explaing really obvious shit like thwat the big 3 are, it get really annoying, if we were having this conversation inperson i would talk r e a l s l o w just to make sure you were getting it, fuck it i'm done wiht this subject an for now with this forum see ya.Well, since you dont seems to have anything constructive to add, and seem to think character attacks are okay, we are in agreeance on something, maybe this forum isnt for you. Also if you cannot take the time to flush out your arguments, by explaining what you mean bycertain colloquial terms (like "The Big Three"), its hard to take your arguments eriously. The best debates involve people who are as clear as possible in their arguments. It seems to me, as well, that if you typed out real words, it wouldnt look so hysterical when you called the rest of us stupid. just an idea. Happy trails, TomC - ColbyPants - 02-16-2007 admin Wrote:BL Thats slightly true, but not the reason. I disagree with this. #1 because the tree huggers and anti smokers are different groups (there are several conservative politicians in ohio for example who happily push pro buiness anti enviromental agendas, that also happily pushed the smoking ban, in both cases thinking they have the bottom line in mind) #2 being enviromentally friendly can be economically sound. I mean one of the biggest impressions regarding "foreign branded" automobiles (whether true or not) is that they are easier to maintain, and get better gas mileage, both things enviromentally friendly, and economically sound (in this day of spiking gas prices, mileage is a selling point!)! Honda and Toyota are making a killing in big cities with the (admittedly still small) quickly growing hybrid car markets. if american auto makers stopped paying out all pensions tomorrow, they would be in much better shape to compete. ![]() TomC - Tonto - 02-16-2007 ColbyPants Wrote:admin Wrote:BL Thats slightly true, but not the reason. Regarding the cost of gas... I believe that one of the reasons for the higher gas prices is due to the lack of refineries in the US. None have been built for the last 30 years or so & production is maxed out. Couple this with down time for maintenance & repairs (remember the hurricane damage). Add in how every little community seems to have their own "exotic" blend of gas. reg in NY is not the same as Reg. in ....say....VA, or Ohio. Too many environmental hurdles are now required in order to build a new refinery. I have a 2000 Ford Taurus.....V-6....and I hate the gas mileage that it gets. My wife's minivan gets better. I put $20 into the tank tonight only filled it about 1/2. ![]() - ColbyPants - 02-16-2007 Tonto The Long Island Sidekick Wrote:ColbyPants Wrote:admin Wrote:BL Thats slightly true, but not the reason. this part is true. the gas in ohio seems creepily low grade. Also it would make sense that Katrina caused fluctuation in gas prices. That said, I dont know if running around poking holes in Alaska or a similar place is the answer. Maybe further weaning off of oil. (I willleave at at this, because a discussion regarding fuel consumption and enviromentalism deserves its own thread). Well in theory, wouldnt a reduction in demand for fossil fuels bring the price down? (not really as important to this thread, as the idea of fuel economy in general) My economics are not as strong as some here, I am sure. TomC - Tonto - 02-16-2007 ColbyPants Wrote:Well in theory, wouldnt a reduction in demand for fossil fuels bring the price down? (not really as important to this thread, as the idea of fuel economy in general) My economics are not as strong as some here, I am sure. I'm just an engineer, not an economist, but, yeah, I would think a decrease in demand would lower prices, but not much. The growing economies in China & India are starting to siphon off our suppliers. think the better, solution is to increase the amount of domestic oil production here. And keep that oil here! There is the Alaskan oil fields at ANWAR (not sure of the spelling) that can be taken using environmentally friendly solutions, also the shale oil out in the mid-western states, estimated to be a yield larger than whats under Saudi Arabia, can now be recovered. Twenty years or so ago, we did not have the technology. Today we do. There is also the ban on off shore drilling off the shores of CA. & Fla. Cuba recently found oil, near the keys & is working with Venezuela to extract it. If any of these ideas are implemented, our (US) supply would increase & prices should fall....BUT....there are NO more refineries that could handle that oil. It is estimated that it would take at least 10 years to construct a refinery. - Tonto - 02-16-2007 BTW....we need Parkster's expert opinion here...
- Admin - 02-17-2007 Maybe so, lots of things to blame and ponder why. I can say that much industry has left the US to foreign countries because of environmental contraints and demands. Don't get me wrong, I think we should try to protect the environment and such. A good balance of industry, and environmental protection is required to maintain both a good work base and a safe place to live. Our companies are either closing their doors completely, or moving parts of their operations off-shore. Many of the tree-huggers are also the anti-smoking nazi's. I meant that as a general phrase of how groups of people get together and drive business away either directly, or indirectly from their actions. Steel production in the US is not anything like it used to be. http://www.steelonthenet.com/production.html The US was the ONLY one with a decrease in production. Steel production in the 25 member countries of the European Union increased by 2.5% in November 2006 In the rest of Europe the largest producer is Turkey, where steel production increased by 13.4% in November In the CIS countries crude steel production in Russia rose by 7.5% Steel production in the USA was down by 5.5% in November In South America, Brazilian crude steel production increased by 2.6% Middle Eastern steel showed mixed fortunes with Iranian production in the eleven months up 4.4% In Asia Chinese steel production is still rising, up 24.1% in November Other countries are not really buying "American" because we are not putting out a good product at a reasonable price. The US economy is not going to increase when other countries are not giving us their money for our products. Even if WE buy American, we are only moving our money from one pocket to the next. Its like paying your wife to do the dishes...its the same money in the same family and nobody gets any richer, but the bills still keep coming. And yes, the gas sucks! A week ago the price was $2.19 a gal for the cheap-o gas. Today it was $2.39. I noticed it creeping up every couple days since we got that huge snowstorm. I doubt that the storm really had much effect on price, its the stations trying to cash in again because they "can". Big question is, can GM make a better product at a lower price even after the lay-off? - ColbyPants - 02-17-2007 admin Wrote:Maybe so, lots of things to blame and ponder why. I can say that much industry has left the US to foreign countries because of environmental contraints and demands. Don't get me wrong, I think we should try to protect the environment and such. A good balance of industry, and environmental protection is required to maintain both a good work base and a safe place to live. Our companies are either closing their doors completely, or moving parts of their operations off-shore. I know, but I was on such a roll I couldnt help myself . And your final question is the most important. Its up to them now to show the layoffs are not in vain.TomC - Admin - 02-17-2007 Beerlord Wrote:when i hav eto explaing really obvious shit like thwat the big 3 are, it get really annoying, if we were having this conversation inperson i would talk r e a l s l o w just to make sure you were getting it, fuck it i'm done wiht this subject an for now with this forum see ya. :? And who are the big three? Actually, I really don't know either. I know that GM is one since they make Buick, Pontiac, GMC, GM, Chevrolet, Cadillac, Hummer, Saturn, and Saab. Ford would be another (Lincoln, Mercury, Mazda, Volvo, Jaguar, Land Rover, Aston Martin) I believe that Chrysler is the 3rd? Either way BL, the thread was started by Maduro_Scotty and if you feel we are all stupid, then don't post here. Don't come into someone elses thread and start name calling. I'm no car manufacturer buff but certainly can explain why I bought the cars and trucks I have in the past. While I would love to always buy everything American, its just not possible to always get a quality product by doing so. I personally didn't know who the "big 3" were and I'm pretty sure that I guessed correctly as the rest of the companies I can think of are foreign ones. I actually thought that Volvo and Jaguar was foreign as well, but they are actually Ford. Now we can talk about computers and I bet I can run circles around you and make you feel really stupid for not knowing the coprocessor used with the 8080 CPU. Or maybe you can tell us what this is? Point being, not everyone knows everything and you don't have to be rude when someone asks you to explain your comments so all can understand. (PS. thats a memory chip, 1101 Gold series from 1971 to be exact) - ColbyPants - 02-17-2007 admin Wrote::? And who are the big three? Actually, I really don't know either. I know that GM is one since they make Buick, Pontiac, GMC, GM, Chevrolet, Cadillac, Hummer, Saturn, and Saab. I was astounded when I found out they were owned by ford. That was when I first truly started bluring the lines between foreign and domestic: TomC |