Tenants of the Nazi Party:
1) Extreme Environmentalists
2) Irrationally against pollution
3) The "people's car" in the Volkswagon
4) Against Big Business unless run by Government
5) Against Jewish Capitalism
6) Two years mandatory service to Germany
7) Make-work projects like the Autobahn
8) Against cruelty to animals yet devalued human life
9) Banned smoking
10) For abortion and euthanasia and elimination of undesireables
11) Cradle to grave national healthcare
Tenants of the American Progressive Movement
1) Extreme Environmentalists
2) Irrationally against pollution and Global Warming enthusiasts
3) Their "people's car" are electrics and hybrids nobody wants
4) Against Big Business, Obama Motors, nuff said
5) Resdistribution of Wealth and punish the private sector
6) BO said Americans should serve as "brown shirt" non militia!
7) Stimulus plan for big spending on infastructure
8) No Conservative is a PETA member
9) Liberals are for smoking bans; this includes RHINO's
10 Which party is for abortion?
11) Which party is pushing for national healthcare?
Hmmmmmm! 1-11 look pretty similiar to me!
I am not calling the "other" party Nazi's. Just sick of them referring to Conservatism and the non-Conservative GWB as a Nazi. When in fact there are more resemblences to Nazi-ism with their own party than the Republicans or Conservatives.
Posts: 1,507
Threads: 91
Joined: Aug 2007
Reputation:
5
1942 : Papieren bitte!
2011 : National ID Card, please!
Posts: 31,605
Threads: 1,337
Joined: Apr 2006
Reputation:
35
US_Tank Wrote:German's were also encouraged to "snitch" on their fellow countrymen who did not agree with the government movement.
Now Barack Obama has created flag@whitehouse.gov for Dems to snitch on Americans who give "false" information regarding the healthcare plan.
This nukes the Lib "Patriot Act" arguement!
This collecting the info of people who have/say "fishy" information appears to violate several Federal laws....
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/08/07/white-house-collect-fishy-info-health-reform-illegal-critics-say/
The White House strategy of turning supporters into snitches when they see "fishy" information about the health care debate may run afoul of the law, legal experts say.
"The White House is in bit of a conundrum because of this privacy statute that prohibits the White House from collecting data and storing it on people who disagree with it," Judge Andrew Napolitano, a FOX News analyst, said Friday.
"There's also a statute that requires the White House to retain all communications that it receives. It can't try to rewrite history by pretending it didn't receive anything," he said.
"If the White House deletes anything, it violates one statute. If the White House collects data on the free speech, it violates another statute."
Napolitano was referring to the Privacy Act of 1974, which was passed after the Nixon administration used federal agencies to illegally investigate individuals for political purposes. Enacted after Richard Nixon's resignation in the Watergate scandal, the statute generally prohibits any federal agency from maintaining records on individuals exercising their right to free speech.
cont.....
If Sonny had EZ-Pass, he'd have survived that hit...
Never apologize mister, it's a sign of weakness. - Capt. Nathan Cutting Brittles
